Government

Future of Duluth's EPA Lab in Jeopardy Amid Proposed Cuts

Published March 20, 2025

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has suggested significant reductions in its scientific and research division, potentially affecting the future of the Duluth lab in Minnesota. This laboratory is home to more than 100 employees, and the proposal could eliminate up to 75% of its workforce.

According to a report by the New York Times, the Trump administration's budget proposal aims to disband the EPA's Office of Research and Development (ORD). Documents examined by the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology reveal plans to cut a large portion of the ORD, of which the Great Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division laboratory is a vital part.

This lab is well-respected in the field of aquatic science, known globally for establishing protocols that assess how harmful chemicals impact the environment.

While the implications for the Duluth laboratory remain unclear, some estimates suggest that as many as 75% of the ORD's staff could lose their jobs. Current records indicate that 136 individuals are employed at the Duluth facility.

Dale Hoff, the lab's director, refrained from commenting on the future of the Duluth lab, stating that he has limited information about the situation.

During a virtual town hall meeting, officials mentioned that the dismantling of the ORD would likely necessitate congressional action, sparking conversations among employees regarding their future. Employees were advised to safeguard important files from their work computers.

U.S. Rep. Zoe Lofgren, a Democrat from California, criticized the proposal, arguing that eliminating the ORD is illegal and undermines the agency's obligation to rely on sound scientific research.

Impact and Reactions

The proposal has raised concerns among scientists and former employees who emphasize the importance of the Duluth lab's work. Jack Kelly, a former chief at the lab, expressed his disappointment at the potential cuts, stating that the national investment in the lab's staff should not be discarded.

Kelly highlighted the lab's role in environmental protection and its contribution to developing standards for pollutant assessments, including research into harmful chemicals like PFAS, often labeled as "forever chemicals" due to their persistence in the environment.

John Morrice, a retired research biologist, also shared his perspectives, emphasizing the need for robust scientific data to support water protection laws. He noted that if the Duluth lab were to close, the void left would be challenging for academic institutions to fill.

Historical Background

Established in 1967, the Duluth lab was created following a congressional initiative to improve water quality across the United States. It became part of the EPA when the agency was formed in 1970.

Since its inception, the lab has focused on vital research that impacts environmental health, including creating standards for water quality and assessing chemical effects on aquatic life.

If the Duluth lab were to be shuttered, it would represent a significant loss not only for the scientific community but for public health and environmental safety interests across the United States.

EPA, Duluth, laboratory