Crypto

Can Quantum Computers Break Bitcoin? Google's Latest Chip Sparks Fresh Debate

Published December 11, 2024

Google's recent unveiling of its advanced Willow quantum processor has reignited discussions about the security of cryptocurrencies, particularly Bitcoin. Observers have speculated whether quantum computers might eventually be able to break Bitcoin’s encryption.

The tech company asserts that its new quantum processor can perform specific calculations in just five minutes—an operation that would take classical supercomputers an impractically long time to accomplish.

Quantum computing represents a revolutionary approach to processing information, utilizing the peculiar characteristics of quantum physics. Unlike traditional computers that use bits to process data as either 0 or 1, quantum computers utilize quantum bits, or qubits, which can exist in both states simultaneously. This property enables quantum computers to handle vast possibilities at once, amplifying their computational capabilities.

Google claims it has made strides in quantum error correction, marking an essential step toward making quantum computing viable for practical applications.

But can the Willow chip actually penetrate Bitcoin's defenses yet?

According to industry experts, the answer is no, at least for now. Analysts from AllianceBernstein reported that while the Willow chip boasts 105 qubits, it is still significantly short of the several million qubits that would be necessary to jeopardize the Bitcoin network. In the world of quantum computing, a qubit is the fundamental unit that represents data.

“Should Bitcoin stakeholders start preparing for a quantum future?” Bernstein analysts queried, answering, “Yes, but any real threat to Bitcoin appears to remain decades away.”

If quantum computers reach a sufficient level of advancement, they could theoretically disrupt blockchains. This disruption might occur by employing algorithms to crack cryptographic keys, compromise hash functions, and take control of mining activities. However, these dangers remain largely theoretical at this stage, and the blockchain industry is actively pursuing quantum-resistant solutions to bolster security.

“Debates amongst Bitcoin developers about transitioning to quantum-resistant encryption are ongoing,” the analysts noted.

Currently, the Bitcoin network is recognized as the most secure computing network in existence and has never fallen victim to a successful hack. To compromise the Bitcoin network, an attacker would need to control more than 50% of its computing power, which is an astronomically difficult task.

In response to Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai's announcement about Google's technological advancements, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin posed a poignant question: "What's the largest semiprime you can factor?"

This inquiry is significant for two key reasons.

First, factoring large semiprimes—numbers formed by multiplying two prime numbers—is central to undermining RSA cryptography, a standard widely employed in secure communications and cryptography systems.

Second, the largest semiprime that a chip like Google's Willow can factor represents a practical limit on its ability to break RSA encryption.

For conventional computers, this benchmark determines the current secure key sizes. In the realm of quantum computing, monitoring advancements in semiprime factoring capabilities is crucial to assessing when these machines may reach the power necessary to breach common RSA key sizes.

The direct relevance of this to quantum computing and blockchain security cannot be overstated:

Current RSA systems generally utilize 2048-bit or 4096-bit keys. Quantum computers that can factor semiprimes of these sizes would pose a serious threat to those encryption systems.

Quantum Resistance as a Potential Solution

Buterin has engaged deeply with the idea of “quantum resistance” within cryptocurrencies and other applications based on blockchain technology.

According to a blog post by Buterin, achieving quantum resistance in cryptocurrency involves designing cryptographic systems from scratch while taking into account the potential threats from quantum computing advancements.

In 2019, Buterin concluded that Google’s strides in quantum computing should not alarm those in the cryptocurrency space.

"It isn't accurate to state that quantum computers can disrupt all cryptography; they can compromise some cryptographic algorithms,” he asserted, adding, “For every cryptographic algorithm that quantum computers can penetrate, we have alternative solutions that quantum technology cannot break."

While the time frame for the emergence of a quantum computer capable of breaching the Bitcoin network is uncertain, the broader implications of such an event could resonate throughout the world's computing infrastructures. If the most powerful computing network were to be compromised, it raises the specter that all systems globally could be similarly vulnerable.

Quantum, Bitcoin, Cryptography